NEW

Letter to the Editor: Welcome the Afghani Refugees but Know the Problems

Welcome the Afghani Refugees But Know the Problems   Dear Sir, There is widespread sympathy for resettling Afghans into Britain fleeing from tyranny and persecution and I am supportive of it. Many of them are Muslims and will have every facility to follow their...

Letter to the Editor: Irrational Optimism

  Irrational Optimism Dear Sir, I read the latest [anon.] article from Anglican Futures, EC8087. It is helpful and clear but, for me, there is a deep undercurrent of a seemingly determined [irrational?] optimism. The article outlines the overall workings of...

Letter to the Editor: Covid Restrictions

  Covid Restrictions Dear Sir,  I refer to the letter in Issue 8084 entitled ‘Power belongeth unto Christ’ which Scripturally outlines where all power belongs and exposes the inconsistencies of our Government and their COVID restrictions on the public worship of...

Free Presbyterians Protest COP26 Visit of Pope Francis

Free Presbyterians Protest COP26 visit of Pope Francis  The Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland has sent a protest to the First Minister urging her to resist political and diplomatic ties with the Pope, ahead of the COP26 summit of world leaders in Glasgow in...

Episcopal Church Pays $4,500,000 to Diocese of Ft Worth

Episcopal Church Pays $4,500,000 to Diocese of Fort Worth, Texas By Suzanne Gill With encouragement from the 141st District Court, the Diocese entered into mediation with The Episcopal Church (TEC) in early June to settle claims of the Diocese for attorneys’ fees and...

Report from Anglican Ink on Episcopal Church Legal Spending

Report from Anglican Ink on Episcopal Church Legal Spending By Jeff Walton This report follows on the announcement that the Diocese of Fort Worth received $4,500,000 from the Episcopal Church to cover the expenses incurred by the Diocese after it left the Episcopal...

Pilgrim’s Process: Common Grace by Peter Sanlon

Pilgrim’s Process  By Peter Sanlon Common Grace Loving God is so important for satisfaction and joy in life, that it is easy to mistakenly think only spiritual concerns are important in life. There are many ways for this error to arise: We can think the only truly...

Church in Wales Embraces the Zeitgeist

The Church in Wales Embraces the Zeitgeist Meeting on Monday 6 September, the Governing Body of the Church in Wales, voted to approve same-sex blessings but stopped short of approving marriage. The change does not allow for same-sex marriages in a Church in Wales...

The History of Christianity in Britain and Ireland

The History of Christianity in Britain and Ireland From the first century to the twenty-first Gerald Bray Apollos, 2021 (ISBN: 978-1-78974-120-9, 693pp) Throughout his long academic career Bray has ably straddled both doctrine and ecclesiastical history, so it is no...

Anglican Futures: Knitted Together In Love

Anglican Futures "Knitted together in love" - Should Christian Communities be 'Thicker'? The terms 'thick' and 'thin' have been used by sociologists and political scientists to describe cultures  for decades.  Thick cultures are socio-centric; they tend to be...

Questions Out of LFF, Letter to the Editor

Dear Sir,

I read the first article from Anglican Futures, regarding the document, Living In Love and Faith, [LLF] EC 8083. I found the article helpful, well presented and gives a clear overview of the document. 

However, I found myself seriously disquieted and I raise 3 interrelated comments out of a larger number: [1] There is a somewhat pervasive optimism that the document will act as a catalyst for a positive step forward in the discussions regarding sexuality in the Church. This optimism is also found in Evangelical circles: I checked out Church Society which has some helpful material on LLF and although some serious flaws in LLF are pointed out am I alone in seeing the direction of travel in the C of E? 

I want to ask, can anyone point to a substantial, Biblical gain that has emerged from Synod in recent years? Just what have the Evangelicals on Synod actually achieved in steering Synod into a more Biblical position on anything, either morally, or doctrinally or in worship? Do we seriously believe that an Evangelical voice will be distinctly sounded and accepted in this debate? Of course, I will apologise if I am mistaken but Francis Schaeffer was correct in his perceptive aphorism, “Nature eats up Grace.” Compromise compounds irrelevance. [2] The opening section on scripture presents 7 positions, and this fails to engender any confidence in what follows. The 1st view presented is an emaciated caricature of the Evangelical position on Scripture – I would reject this erroneous presentation. The 7th position is virtually atheism and thus rejected. 

The other 5 positions are presented as a range of possible answers as to the unity and authority of the Bible. But, what does the Bible say about itself? Where is there a statement of the 39 articles regarding Scripture – the position each and every clergyman and Bishop swore to uphold? Failure at this point is failure across the board. [3] I cannot help but think that the title of the document is purposely phrased, the ambiguity being, Living in Love [as we now define it] and [with a redefined] Faith, so that all positions can be fully accommodated and the unity of the C of E can be maintained. Love is to be as  understood and accepted with its variety of sexual practices – isn’t this the purpose of LLF? and Faith can be understood to reflect these changes – choose your view of Scripture to suit your taste. 

This is not a document for the Evangelical to accept or even debate.

John Dunn

Isle of Wight

Previous

Next