NEW

Letter to the Editor: Response to the Last Editorial

Letter to the Editor Response to Last Edition’s Editorial Dear Editor, Thank you very much for your Christian charity and spirited editorial, Friday 8th October 2021, ( E.C. No.8090).  Also thanks are due to you for reprinting so much excellent reformed evangelical...

Letter to the Editor: The Murder of Sir David Amess

Murder of Sir David Amess Dear Editor, I grieve at the loss of a friend and former Party colleague Sir David Amess, MP who was murdered in an increasingly dangerous world. In the 70s I worked with David in the Young Conservatives before he became an MP and he was...

Reformation Sunday Advert

LETTER TO THE EDITOR:                        15 October 2021. My ‘Advert’ titled “Reformation Sunday 31 October” said, “The Church of England should still celebrate this 500th year since Martin Luther declared at the ‘Diet of Worms’ in 1521, “Here I stand. God help...

Leicester Diocese Illogical

Letter to the Editor Leicester Diocese Illogical   Sir, Leicester Diocese’s decision on 9 October to replace its traditional Parishes with ‘Minsters' is both spiritually and financially illogical.  The Church of England’s own growth report ‘From Anecdote to...

Barnabas Fund Reports: Turkey Escalates Airstrikes Against Christians in Syria & Iraq

Barnabas Fund Reports Turkey Escalating Airstrikes Against Christians and other Minorities in Syria and Iraq Turkey has escalated a supposedly anti-terrorist military campaign in Syria and Iraq which appears to be targeting Christians and other minorities. A spate of...

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Gospel-Driven Anglicanism Part 4

Should I Stay or Should I Go? By the Revd Dr Mark Pickles Part 4 Gedaliah is appointed governor and we read that Jeremiah purposely chooses to live amongst “those of the poorest of the land who had not been taken into exile in Babylon” (40:7). Things have taken a turn...

466th Anniversary of the Martyrdoms of Latimer & Ridley

466th Anniversary of the Martyrdoms of Latimer & Ridley Saturday, 16 October marked the 466th anniversary of the martyrdoms of Bishops Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley.   They were burned at the stake after being found guilty of heresy due to their refusal to...

Clive West Memorial Trust Lecture: John Yates III to Speak

Clive West Memorial Trust Lecture  Revd Dr John Yates III to Speak The annual Clive West Memorial Lecture will be held on Thursday, 11 November at 19:30 at St Nicholas’ Church, Lisburn Road in Belfast.  This year’s speaker is the Revd Dr John Yates III, Rector of Holy...

Book Review: Bleeding for Jesus

Bleeding for Jesus John Smyth and the cult of the Iwerne Camps Andrew Graystone Darton, Longman and Todd, 2021 (ISBN: 9781913657123, 250pp, £12.99) This book is the latest instalment of a long-running tragedy. It comes six years after the author was first made aware...

School Pupils Across the Country Memorise Passages from BCP for £1,000 Prize

School Pupils Across the Country  Memorise Book of Common Prayer Passages  £1,000 Prize for Winner By Tim Stanley Hundreds of school pupils across the country are busy this term studying prayers and readings from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer in a bid to win a prize...

Gospel-Driven Anglicanism: Reformed Anglicanism vs Popular Evangelicalism by Mark Pickles

Gospel-Driven Anglicanism

Baptism Part 2

By The Revd Dr Mark Pickles

Circumcision is a sign of the covenant that God made with Abraham (Genesis 17) and that at the heart of the covenant is the promise of God to Abraham and his offspring that he will be their God, they will be his people.  In the case of Abraham who comes to faith from a pagan background he then receives the covenant sign of circumcision.  So in Abraham, we see the same pattern that we noted the New Testament profession of faith followed by receiving the covenant sign.  

However, what is fascinating is to see what happens to his son Isaac:

“This is my covenant which you shall keep, between me and you and your offspring after you:  Every male among you shall be circumcised.  You shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and you.  He  who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised”. (Genesis 17:10-12)

What is clear is that the sons of adult believers  were also to receive the covenant sign at eight days old, clearly well before it was possible for them to profess the faith themselves.  God was saying to Abraham that as the child of a believer, his son was to be included within the covenant and to receive the covenant sign.  

At this point it is clear that God explicitly commands that a sign of faith be administered to a person who does not possess or cannot yet articulate that which the sign signifies.  It is not to be given to everyone, only to the children of believers but it is to be given before they had personally came to faith.

Now when we come to the New Testament, again from an understanding of covenantal theology, we see that baptism replaces circumcision as the outward sign of an inward invisible grace, it is a covenantal sign and we see the same pattern as regards adult believers.  Those who come to faith after hearing the gospel are quite clearly instructed to be baptised, as we have seen people like the Ethiopian eunuch, or later in Acts Cornelius, Lydia, and the Philippian jailer.

However, the million-dollar question is:  “but what of their children”?

Does a child of a believer receive the sign of the Covenant in the New Testament as it does in the Old Testament?

There is clearly one difference at least.  In the Old Testament the covenant sign was given only to males, to men and boys but in the New Testament it is given to women as well.

Paul in Galatians 3:27-28 writes that “as many of you as were baptised into Christ have put on Christ.  There is neither Jew nor Greek,  there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”.  The implication being that all the aforementioned had been baptised thus making clear their unity in Christ.  In Acts 16 we read of the baptism of Lydia.

It is interesting to note that in this regard at least the New Covenant is more expansive not less, the New Covenant in this regard is more inclusive than the Old Covenant.  

What would appear strange, to say the least, is the idea that after 2,000 years of children being included in the covenant, that that would suddenly change and that from the Day of Pentecost onwards, children would excluded, immediately and without a single word.

In fact, not just strange, inconceivable.

We understand how revolutionary it was for Peter to grasp that the food laws had changed.  In Acts 10 and 11, Luke records the story for us, in effect repeating the story three times to emphasise the truth of this dramatic change.  Mark also draws our attention to it, in Mark 7:19.  It is extraordinary to believe that a change as huge as this, as regards the covenant would take place without any express command.  It is unbelievable to imagine being a believer whose children were in the covenant one day and then not in it the next, without a word of explanation anywhere in Scripture.

Modern evangelicals tend not to be so covenantal in our thinking and so we perhaps do not immediately think like this but it would be extraordinary and the idea that it changed without a whisper in the New Testament is implausible and inconceivable.

“Isn’t it strange that this departure and deviation from the purity of the apostolic church took place to the extent that it captured the whole of Christendom and not one single word of protest survives from that period?  Now that’s an argument from silence.  But it’s a very screaming silence”.  RC Sproul, Case for Infant Baptism, the Historic Paedobaptist Position

Excerpted from Gospel-Driven Anglicanism, by The Revd Dr Mark Pickles, pages 39-41

Previous

Next