Anglican Futures: Anglican Alphabet Spaghetti

Anglican Futures Anglican Alphabetti Spaghetti A dummies guide to the plethora of organisations and acronyms linked to faithful Anglicans in the UK and Europe. I once spent some time around military personel.  Everything had its own TLA (Three Letter Acronym) right...

Canterbury Tales: Favourite Bible Stories Retold by Archbishop Justin Welby

Canterbury Tales Favourite Bible stories retold by Archbishop Justin Welby The Good Samaritan A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead, halfway...

Anglican Mission in England Elects Two Suffragan Bishops

Anglican Mission in England Elects Two Suffragan Bishops The Anglican Mission in England (AMiE) met in Synod on 18 June.  While there, they elected two suffragan bishops to aid Bishop Andy Lines in providing episcopal oversight for the overall work.  Bishop Lines also...

Pride Flags Causing Conflict at Christian School

Pride Flags Cause Conflict at Christian School Conflict has broken out in a Christian school in Oxfordshire over the display of “Pride” flags. The institution in question is Kingham Hill School.  The same Trust (Kingham Hill Trust) oversees Oak Hill College, an...

Prayer Book Society Raising Funds to Put BCPs in the Hands of Choristers

Prayer Book Society Raising Funds to Put BCPs in the Hands of Choristers The Prayer Book Society, which will soon celebrate its 50th Anniversary, is raising funds to put a special edition BCP into the hands of junior choristers around the nation.   The idea came to...

Book Review: Reimagining Britain by Justin Welby

Reimagining Britain Foundations for Hope Justin Welby Bloomsbury, 2018, new edn. 2021 (ISBN: 978-1-4729-8497-5, 322pp, £12.99) The Archbishop of Canterbury has made several notable political interventions recently, including over ‘partygate’ and the Rwanda deportation...

Birthday of Anglicanism in America

Birthday of Anglicanism in America By the Revd Canon Chuck Collins June 16, 1607 was the birthday of Anglicanism in America. On this day Captain John Smith and 104 others celebrated the Lord’s Supper when they arrived safely in Jamestown, Virginia. Jamestown was the...

Barnabas Fund Report: Two ChiBok Girls Found

Barnabas Fund Reports Two Chibok Girls Found After 8 Years 24 June 2022 Two women, who were among hundreds of schoolgirls abducted by Boko Haram from the Nigerian town of Chibok eight years ago, have been found. Hauwa Joseph was discovered among a group of other...

New Bishop-elect for the Diocese of Cashel, Ferns & Ossory

Church of Ireland News New Bishop Elected for Cashel, Ferns & Ossory The Church of Ireland diocese of Cashel, Ferns, and Ossory now has a bishop-elect.  The Venerable Adrian Wilkinson, Archdeacon of Cork, Cloyne, and Ross was elected to succeed the Rt Revd Michael...

Editorial: Lessons to be Learned from the American Pro-Life Movement

Editorial Lessons to be Learned from American Pro-Life Movement Friday, 24 June 2022, the Feast of St John the Baptist, will be a date which will live in infamy amongst the supporters of abortion.  On that date, the US Supreme Court, overturned the precedent set by...

Letter: Regarding Gatiss & the Call to Action

Letter to the Editor

Dear Sir,

Two related comments about Mr. Gatiss’ Calls for Action, EC.8098. 

First, I searched in vain for a clear statement of action for if ever a clarion call were needed it must be here [yet again, we still wait!]. The nearest I perceived was the comment “not just to resist but to pull hard in the opposite direction.” Then followed a series of hopeful platitudes that things might not be as bad as we imagine, ameliorating comments that sidestep the huge nature of the problem. He points out briefly and correctly, the weakness of many Evangelicals who have capitulated to the mind-set which surrounds them. But where is there any clear and decisive comment of what must be done to resist? Where in these comments was the reminder that the honour of the Living God is at stake? The clear delineation of the righteousness and holiness required in God’s people? That the document Living in Love and Faith is not the Gospel but the deception of Satan? This document is the latest abomination from Synod and it seems we have the option of voting it out. So, it seems Gospel truth is decided by a show of hands! 

However, this bring us to the Second point, there is an alternative not mentioned, the back door option. How were the 39 Articles relegated to being mere historical documents? By a vote? What led to the Bible being denied as the final authority in all matters of faith and practice? A show of hands? No. Any Evangelical objections were sidestepped and “it just happened”. Liberalism loves the back door, it is rarely noticed and usually left unguarded. Our two fundamental pillars slowly evaporated and were eviscerated of any importance and all business in Synod is now without any fundamental foundation – the liberal agenda has won because Evangelicals work within the liberal framework.

Whatever the nature of the decision regarding the document Living in Love and Faith, be sure of this: if rejected, it will be slipped in quietly by the back door; if accepted, in whatever form, it will be without any significant demur. Do we really show Biblical resistance by voting? Truly? Bible believing Christian do not debate sin, they proclaim against it. This document should be denounced for what it is, an abomination, an affront to the Holy, Lord of Glory. Since when has Biblical truth and the Holiness of God been decided by a show of hands? This document denies the Gospel, it will destroy lives, it dims yet further the fading light of Evangelical clarity and sets yet more firmly the retreat from the truth of Salvation only in Christ. There is a fallacy which too many Evangelicals refuse to see: we never return to the point we left. The document may fail to pass [openly] this time but the downward slope is irreversible. Mr. Gatiss reminds us that the devil is a liar and the arch deceiver. Do we debate wickedness or denounce it?

Here is a mode of resistance if you will: when the document comes up again – and it will do so until “in” – will all the Evangelicals in Synod stand as one man, denounce the document for the abomination it is and refuse to debate this sin? Will they call Synod to repentance for countenancing such wickedness and call for those who practice such God denying activities to leave? Will they do so volubly and persistently? To ask the question is to know the answer.

Yours, sincerely,

John Dunn