Anglican Futures: Anglican Alphabet Spaghetti

Anglican Futures Anglican Alphabetti Spaghetti A dummies guide to the plethora of organisations and acronyms linked to faithful Anglicans in the UK and Europe. I once spent some time around military personel.  Everything had its own TLA (Three Letter Acronym) right...

Canterbury Tales: Favourite Bible Stories Retold by Archbishop Justin Welby

Canterbury Tales Favourite Bible stories retold by Archbishop Justin Welby The Good Samaritan A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead, halfway...

Anglican Mission in England Elects Two Suffragan Bishops

Anglican Mission in England Elects Two Suffragan Bishops The Anglican Mission in England (AMiE) met in Synod on 18 June.  While there, they elected two suffragan bishops to aid Bishop Andy Lines in providing episcopal oversight for the overall work.  Bishop Lines also...

Pride Flags Causing Conflict at Christian School

Pride Flags Cause Conflict at Christian School Conflict has broken out in a Christian school in Oxfordshire over the display of “Pride” flags. The institution in question is Kingham Hill School.  The same Trust (Kingham Hill Trust) oversees Oak Hill College, an...

Prayer Book Society Raising Funds to Put BCPs in the Hands of Choristers

Prayer Book Society Raising Funds to Put BCPs in the Hands of Choristers The Prayer Book Society, which will soon celebrate its 50th Anniversary, is raising funds to put a special edition BCP into the hands of junior choristers around the nation.   The idea came to...

Book Review: Reimagining Britain by Justin Welby

Reimagining Britain Foundations for Hope Justin Welby Bloomsbury, 2018, new edn. 2021 (ISBN: 978-1-4729-8497-5, 322pp, £12.99) The Archbishop of Canterbury has made several notable political interventions recently, including over ‘partygate’ and the Rwanda deportation...

Birthday of Anglicanism in America

Birthday of Anglicanism in America By the Revd Canon Chuck Collins June 16, 1607 was the birthday of Anglicanism in America. On this day Captain John Smith and 104 others celebrated the Lord’s Supper when they arrived safely in Jamestown, Virginia. Jamestown was the...

Barnabas Fund Report: Two ChiBok Girls Found

Barnabas Fund Reports Two Chibok Girls Found After 8 Years 24 June 2022 Two women, who were among hundreds of schoolgirls abducted by Boko Haram from the Nigerian town of Chibok eight years ago, have been found. Hauwa Joseph was discovered among a group of other...

New Bishop-elect for the Diocese of Cashel, Ferns & Ossory

Church of Ireland News New Bishop Elected for Cashel, Ferns & Ossory The Church of Ireland diocese of Cashel, Ferns, and Ossory now has a bishop-elect.  The Venerable Adrian Wilkinson, Archdeacon of Cork, Cloyne, and Ross was elected to succeed the Rt Revd Michael...

Editorial: Lessons to be Learned from the American Pro-Life Movement

Editorial Lessons to be Learned from American Pro-Life Movement Friday, 24 June 2022, the Feast of St John the Baptist, will be a date which will live in infamy amongst the supporters of abortion.  On that date, the US Supreme Court, overturned the precedent set by...

Prudence Dailey’s Commentary: Conversion Therapy; Does Anyone Really Know What Banning it Would Entail?

Prudence Dailey’s Commentary

‘Conversion Therapy’: Does Anyone Really Know What Banning it Would Entail?

Hitherto, I have avoided addressing directly the current debates about what are described as ‘LGBT issues’: they are toxic and divisive, have dominated Church politics for too long, and (as I have written before) have distorted or even displaced a proper consideration of Christian sexual ethics more generally. Unfortunately, though, a recent official statement by the Bishop of Dorchester—one of the Area Bishops in my own Diocese, the Diocese of Oxford—has made it difficult to remain silent.

As readers will be aware, the Government recently undertook a public consultation on proposals for ‘a legislative ban on the practice of so-called conversion therapy’, which seeks to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. This followed a 2017 vote by the General Synod of the Church of England—following a highly emotive and ill-prepared debate on an amendment from the floor—calling on the government to impose such a ban.

The government is right to refer to ‘so called’ conversion therapy, since no one actually claims to be engaging in such therapy: it is only the advocates of a ban who use this terminology. Furthermore, there is no agreement as to what constitutes ‘conversion therapy’: pretty much everyone concurs that coercive and abusive practices should be illegal (and, indeed, they already are—but if it is thought that a specific legal ban might strengthen protection, then so be it). Depending on how it is defined, however, ‘conversion therapy’ might potentially also cover everything from psychological counselling, willingly entered into, with the aim of shifting a person’s sexual orientation or perceived ‘gender identity’; to offering prayer and pastoral support to those wishing to live in accordance with the teaching of the Church.

Vocal LGBT campaigners within the Church, such as Jayne Ozanne, are unequivocal that a ban should indeed encompass private prayer and pastoral conversations—as is already the case in the Australian State of Victoria, for example—and that ‘suppression’ of sexual orientation should also be within its scope.

It was against this background that 2546 Christian ministers and pastoral workers—including many from the Church of England—signed the ‘Ministers’ Consultation Response’ sent to the Secretary of State in December last year. Their letter distanced its signatories from ‘evil and disreputable past practices which are already illegal and which Christians are the first to condemn’, making it clear that their concern was not about the banning of coercive practices. Rather, they expressed their fear that simply promulgating traditional Christian teaching about sexuality and marriage might unwittingly be criminalised. (The full text of the Ministers’ Consultation Response can be found online at ).

Following media coverage of the this letter, the Bishop of Dorchester, the Rt Revd Gavin Collins, issued an official statement on behalf of the Diocese:

The letter has undoubtedly upset a lot of people. It puts out a message that people aren’t safe or welcome in our churches, and it cuts across the settled view of the Church of England that coercive conversion therapy is unacceptable and should be banned.

“I am disappointed that the authors have used an open letter to diminish people who are in faithful same sex relationships and those who are transgender. Thankfully, the views expressed in the letter are not representative of the Church of England today. I am clear that we are all made in God’s image, that all are welcome in His church and that everyone has a place at the table.”

It seems difficult to escape the inference that this response distorts and misrepresents the authors’ intent—and, indeed, many have reached that conclusion. I do not know Bishop Collins personally, but those who do speak highly of his pastoral gifts: it seems highly likely that his motivation was only to be seen to offer support to the ‘LGBT community’, and that the undermining of those holding the orthodox position was collateral damage rather than deliberate intent.

In the context of the controversy aroused by the Bishop’s statement, I asked the Bishop of Oxford, the Rt Revd Steven Crofts, a question at a recent meeting of the Diocesan Synod: ‘Can the Bishop give an assurance that the Diocese does not support the criminalisation of those offering pastoral support to live in accordance with the teaching of the Church of England who actively seek such support?’ Happily, the Bishop did indeed give that assurance—and, as he was doing so, I saw Jayne Ozanne shaking her head.

Clearly, the Diocese is attempting to be all things to all men. It is seeking to align itself with the most far-reaching demands by the LGBT campaigners for ‘conversion therapy’ ban, while at the same time reassuring those who hold the traditional view that it also supports them—without, apparently, having noticed that these positions are logically incompatible. It is devoutly to be hoped that the Government (which has previously acknowledged the need to preserve freedom of religion) fully comprehends this tension before it attempts to legislate, otherwise goodness knows what kind of a mess we shall find ourselves in.

Miss Dailey has served as a member of General Synod for over twenty years.