Former Liberal Democrat Leader’s Remarks on the Death of Queen Elizabeth

Former Liberal Democrat Leader’s Remarks on the Death of Queen Elizabeth Tim Farron (Lib-Dem), MP for Westmoreland and Lonsdale spoke from the floor of the House of Commons to express his thoughts on the late Queen Elizabeth. The day after her untimely demise he...

Queen’s Choice of Hymns and Scripture Readings

Queen’s Choice of Hymns & Scripture Readings Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth demonstrated the depth of her faith and understanding of the scriptures and hymnody when planning her funeral.  The hymns were melodic works of substance, truth, and comfort designed for...

Church Leaders and Parliamentarians Pay Tribute

Church Leaders and Parliamentarians Pay Tribute In a statement given shortly after the announcement of the Queen’s death, Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby said: “As we grieve together, we know that, in losing our beloved Queen, we have lost the person whose...

Keene Review: God’s Church for God’s World Part One

God’s Church for God’s World Faithful perspectives on mission and ministry Tom Woolford and Adam Young (eds.) IVP, 2022 (ISBN: 9781789742244, 218pp, £19.99) Part One   This is an important book which takes a snapshot of evangelical ministry in 2022. The title and...

The Faith of the Queen; A Cleric’s Reflections

The Faith of the Queen A Cleric’s Reflections As far as we know, Queen Elizabeth II commended only one book published during her long reign. In 2016 she penned the Foreword to a volume produced jointly by the Bible Society, HOPE and the London Institute of...

Collins: The Elizabethan Settlement

The Elizabethan Settlement By Revd Canon Chuck Collins Queen of England for 44 years, Elizabeth died March 24, 1603. She was the daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, the last of the five monarchs in the House of Tudor. She never married ("Virgin Queen"). Her coffin...

Pilgrim’s Process: Rebuke

Pilgrim’s Process By the Revd Dr Peter Sanlon Rebuke In the fifth century some monks in France realised that Augustine’s theological writings commended a Biblical and God focused vision of the Christian pilgrimage. Augustine has been called the ‘Doctor of grace’ for...

Anglican Bishop of Norwich Joins in Roman Catholic Requiem Mass for The Queen

Anglican Bishop of Norwich Joins in Roman Catholic Requiem Mass for The Queen Church of England Bishop of Norwich, Graham Usher joined in a Roman Catholic Requiem Mass for Her Majesty The Queen at St John’s Roman Catholic Cathedral in Norwich on 15 September.   Roman...

The Queen’s Faith in Her Own Words

The Queen’s Faith – in Her Own Words Its formal name was ‘Her Majesty’s Most Gracious Speech’. To the royal household, it was known as the QXB – the Queen’s Christmas broadcast. Queen Elizabeth II spoke about the significance of Christmas to more people than anyone...

Anglican Futures: A Cure for the Lambeth Hangover?

Anglican Futures Commentary A Cure for the Lambeth Hangover? As the bishops of the Anglican Communion disembark from their flights and return to their dioceses, there is a danger that some will rub their eyes, and realise that however great the party was, there has...

Editorial: Via Media?


Via Media?


Can there be anything more injurious to a free and democratic society than censorship of the press?  It is shocking therefore to read the following in the Media information for the 2022 Lambeth Conference: “The Lambeth Conference reserves the right to deny or withdraw accreditation of journalists from media organisations whose activities run counter to the principles of the spirit of the conference, or put the accreditation to improper use or act in a way not consistent with the principles of the organisation.”

Are they really expecting the secular media to be willing or able to pledge support of the ‘principles and spirit’ of Anglicanism in order to report on the Lambeth Conference? 

The question logically follows, what are these ‘principles and spirit’ to which the press must adhere lest they lose their credentials? Are these principles theological?  If so, which theology?  Will it be the official theology of the Church’s Formularies – the Scriptures, Creeds, Articles of Religion, Book of Homilies, and the 1662 BCP – or will it be whatever is the ‘woke’ theology du jour surging through the chambers of Lambeth Palace and the Anglican Communion Office?

Alas it is unlikely to be the former.  Do the official formularies – still the Canonical standards of the Church of England and the most of the Anglican Communion – carry weight with those organising the conference?

Will the principles and spirit of the Conference allow those holding classical Anglican theological commitments to cover the gathering? Will they be allowed to cast a critical eye in reporting proceedings? Or, will such news outlets be given the cold shoulder as if their questions or news reports are beyond the pale of acceptability? Who now decides what is acceptable to be written about the Lambeth gathering? Is it possible that an agnostic or atheistic journalist from a favoured media organisation will be deemed suitable, whereas a Christian with classical Anglican theological convictions will be excluded? Does ‘mutual flourishing’ give a place to the conservative press?

Censorship is dangerous and those planning the 2022 Lambeth Conference appear to embrace it, if only those guaranteed to provide favourable reports are to be recognised.  Indeed the organisers have plainly announced their intentions to be censorious.

Imagine the Prime Minister’s press office announcing that only news outlets in agreement with the ‘principles and spirit’ of the Conservative party would be allowed to cover their party conferences?  How would that come across?  The weeping and gnashing of teeth would not be surpassed until the Day of Judgment.  The journalists at the Guardian and BBC would condemn this offence against free speech. The TV experts would be trotted out continually to decry the fascistic, dictatorial tendencies that have come to the fore.  Radio 4 presenters would pronounce in most solemn tones the abominable decision.

Sadly, the most likely response to Lambeth’s announcement will be a collective shrug of the media’s shoulders.  In recent years, most of the daily newspapers have eliminated dedicated Religion Correspondents.  This makes control of the news agenda much easier.  Reporting on the Church is a specialist’s area and without journalists experienced in the ways of the institution, censorious bureaucrats have a free hand in setting their agenda without vital questions being asked. 

This decree from the Lambeth organisers, and the treatment of ordinand Calvin Robinson, which we also report in this issue, would indicate that a ‘cancel culture’ has taken hold at the higher levels of church governance in this land. Diversity of all kinds is to be promoted and celebrated, it seems, except diversity of opinion.