Welby in Danger of Losing primus inter pares Role over Same-Sex Blessings


Letter: Bingo’s Ordination?

Letter Bingo’s Ordination? Dear Sir, The Church of England has been ordaining men for centuries, and since the 1990s has had legal authority to ordain women to the priesthood also. According to your recent report, the Revd Bingo Allison declared, "I’m not a man and...

Barnabas Aid Appeal for Democratic Republic of Congo

Barnabas Aid Appeal A bomb explosion ripped through the congregation at a baptismal service last Sunday evening (15 January 2023). Just after the baptisms had been performed, and while a blind pastor was expounding some Bible verses, the improvised explosive device...

Archbishops Differ on Practice if Not on Principle

Archbishops Differ on Practice if not on Principle Archbishop Justin Welby has revealed that he will not bless same-sex relationships, while Archbishop Stephen Cotterell has indicated his intention to do so. Explaining his decision, the Archbishop of Canterbury...

Pilgrim’s Process: Tone, Voice, & Speech

Pilgrim’s Process By the Revd Dr Peter Sanlon Many today are concerned about not just the content of what people say in the public arena, but also the way that whatever is spoken, is said. People can get offended as much by tone or manner, as content. The complex and...

Keene’s Review: Confirm, O Lord by Martin Davie

Defend, O Lord Confirmation according to the Book of Common Prayer Martin Davie Latimer Trust, 2022 (ISBN: 9781906327743, 116pp, £6.50) Confirmation is a vital spiritual coming-of-age rite in churches which practice paedobaptism, giving those for whom promises were...

Orthodox Anglican Provinces Invited to Covenant Members of the Fellowship

Orthodox Anglican Provinces Invited to Covenant Members of the Fellowship Global South May Provide Alternative Episcopal Oversight By Paul Eddy The GSFA has recently invited orthodox provinces across the Communion to formally sign up as full Covenant Members of the...

Diocese of Oxford’s “Bloated Bureaucracy” Under Fire

Diocese of Oxford's "Bloated Bureaucracy" Under Fire by Julian Mann The Diocese of Oxford, one of the best endowed in the Church of England, has come under fire for its alleged ‘bloated bureaucracy’ in a letter from a frontline parish treasurer in London’s Daily...

Gist of Bishops’ Pastoral Letter Regarding Same-Sex Blessings

Gist of Bishops’ Pastoral Letter  New Prayers of Love and Faith We value and want to celebrate faithfulness in relationships. That is why we have drafted and asked the House of Bishops to further refine and commend a new resource to be used in churches, called Prayers...

Editorial: Lambeth 2022 The Elevation of Experience


Lambeth 2022: the Elevation of Experience

The Lambeth Conference is finally over.  Thanks be to God!  Its completion was about enough to turn the most emotionless soul into a pew-jumping Pentecostal. Hallelujah!

However, this most recent gathering did bring clarity. It visibly demonstrated the separation of the wheat from the chaff in the Anglican Communion.  No one need wonder any longer where theological lines are drawn.

Most Anglicans worldwide acknowledge that sexual relations are only permitted between one man and one wife within the context of a life-long marriage.  It is a very simple concept that is very readily understood from scripture.

The Archbishop of Canterbury demonstrated that he could simultaneously accept two contradictory positions as equally valid.  One recalls the quip about the man who “had a mind so fine as to be incapable of understanding contradiction.”

On the one hand, he acknowledged that 1998 Lambeth Resolution I.10 was still the theological standard of the overwhelming majority of the world’s 80,000,000 Anglicans.  On the other, he accepted the revisionists’ view within the church as valid without the need for censure. He pronounced that the revisionist minority arrived at their view after much prayer and study as If that were the unassailable argument in its favour.  

But this is not just prayer and study; this is Revisionists’ Prayer and Study. The Archbishop’s entire rationale for permitting the faddish doctrine of the liberal provinces is that they have come to their position through prayer and study. What special pleading is this? Does this mean that only the revisionists pray, or that there are no scholars to be found at their studies on the conservative side?

Would this argument have held sway at the Council of Nicaea? “We must permit Arian teaching because it was arrived at through prayer and study.” Can the Anglican Communion really be hamstrung by such facile reasoning?

But this is not just prayer and study; this is Revisionists’ Prayer and Study. Revisionists’ Prayer and Study is not the study of Scripture as the final source of authority, submitting to it as God’s Word written. Rather, we have seen them seeking God’s voice in experience, and particularly the lived experience of homosexual people. This sustained reflection on experience has been elevated to a sacred and authoritative status in the Archbishop’s thinking. The mystical term “Prayer and Study” ought not be challenged or questioned; it validates any opinion. 

The Archbishop’s pronouncement has elevated and added Experience (or the liberals’ reflection on it) to become the ‘fourth leg’ to the Anglican Way of doing theology.  For centuries, Hooker’s three-legged stool has held sway—with the Bible being the final authority over Tradition and Reason. 

What Archbishop Welby has done is move from this stable three-legged stool to the wobbly coffee table of John Wesley’s Quadrilateral. The Bible, Tradition and Reason are joined by Experience as the operative means of exegeting and understanding theology. By this means he allows strange and erroneous doctrines to be seen as equally valid as divinely revealed propositional truth. 

Unsurprisingly, 107 bishops from The Episcopal Church in the US sided against Christ’s teaching. All the bishops in Wales and Scotland hold to this perfidious position also.  Thankfully, not all bishops in these Isles agree with the Archbishop, that Prayer and Study act as sanctifiers of false doctrine. Why should the Revisionists’ Prayer and Study be any more special or valid than any other Christian’s, that it be given such hallowed status in a worldwide communion?

The majority of the Anglican Communion disagree with their elevated reflections on experience, as does the Bible, as do the Articles of Religion.  It is wrong; most of all, it is sinful. If any bishop thinks that such false teaching deserves equal acceptance in the church they should admit they are play acting.  One does not follow Jesus by embracing sexual immorality.  Our minds are called to the warning of Isaiah 5:20; “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.”

No matter how elevated Revisionists’ Prayer and Study remains in Archbishop Welby’s mind, no matter how many times he refers to it as a basis for false teaching to be tolerated, the truth of Article XX stands: “it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God’s Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another.”