NEW

Letter to the Editor: Response to the Last Editorial

Letter to the Editor Response to Last Edition’s Editorial Dear Editor, Thank you very much for your Christian charity and spirited editorial, Friday 8th October 2021, ( E.C. No.8090).  Also thanks are due to you for reprinting so much excellent reformed evangelical...

Letter to the Editor: The Murder of Sir David Amess

Murder of Sir David Amess Dear Editor, I grieve at the loss of a friend and former Party colleague Sir David Amess, MP who was murdered in an increasingly dangerous world. In the 70s I worked with David in the Young Conservatives before he became an MP and he was...

Reformation Sunday Advert

LETTER TO THE EDITOR:                        15 October 2021. My ‘Advert’ titled “Reformation Sunday 31 October” said, “The Church of England should still celebrate this 500th year since Martin Luther declared at the ‘Diet of Worms’ in 1521, “Here I stand. God help...

Leicester Diocese Illogical

Letter to the Editor Leicester Diocese Illogical   Sir, Leicester Diocese’s decision on 9 October to replace its traditional Parishes with ‘Minsters' is both spiritually and financially illogical.  The Church of England’s own growth report ‘From Anecdote to...

Barnabas Fund Reports: Turkey Escalates Airstrikes Against Christians in Syria & Iraq

Barnabas Fund Reports Turkey Escalating Airstrikes Against Christians and other Minorities in Syria and Iraq Turkey has escalated a supposedly anti-terrorist military campaign in Syria and Iraq which appears to be targeting Christians and other minorities. A spate of...

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Gospel-Driven Anglicanism Part 4

Should I Stay or Should I Go? By the Revd Dr Mark Pickles Part 4 Gedaliah is appointed governor and we read that Jeremiah purposely chooses to live amongst “those of the poorest of the land who had not been taken into exile in Babylon” (40:7). Things have taken a turn...

466th Anniversary of the Martyrdoms of Latimer & Ridley

466th Anniversary of the Martyrdoms of Latimer & Ridley Saturday, 16 October marked the 466th anniversary of the martyrdoms of Bishops Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley.   They were burned at the stake after being found guilty of heresy due to their refusal to...

Clive West Memorial Trust Lecture: John Yates III to Speak

Clive West Memorial Trust Lecture  Revd Dr John Yates III to Speak The annual Clive West Memorial Lecture will be held on Thursday, 11 November at 19:30 at St Nicholas’ Church, Lisburn Road in Belfast.  This year’s speaker is the Revd Dr John Yates III, Rector of Holy...

Book Review: Bleeding for Jesus

Bleeding for Jesus John Smyth and the cult of the Iwerne Camps Andrew Graystone Darton, Longman and Todd, 2021 (ISBN: 9781913657123, 250pp, £12.99) This book is the latest instalment of a long-running tragedy. It comes six years after the author was first made aware...

School Pupils Across the Country Memorise Passages from BCP for £1,000 Prize

School Pupils Across the Country  Memorise Book of Common Prayer Passages  £1,000 Prize for Winner By Tim Stanley Hundreds of school pupils across the country are busy this term studying prayers and readings from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer in a bid to win a prize...

An Excerpt of the Analysis of the Living in Love and Faith Document

By the Revd Simon Austen

Most would have by now heard of the Church of England’s Living in Love and Faith document which was written as an attempt to explain both sides of the SSM/Ordination debate.  The Revd Simon Austen, Rector of St Leonard’s with Holy Trinity in Exeter Diocese has written an 11 page analysis from a biblical perspective.  We have excerpted a small portion for our readers.  If you wish to read the entire text, it is found on the www.bishopofmaidstone.org website under the Guidance tab.

“Its production was precipitated by the refusal of General Synod to ‘take note’ of the document GS 2055 ‘Marriage and Same Sex relationships after the shared conversations’ which resulted in the Archbishops expressing the desire to have a ‘Radical new inclusion in the church . . . founded in a proper twenty-first century understanding of being human and of being sexual.’

The Living in Love and Faith book and course set out to do this, through information and anecdote. The material is divided into five parts, with stories of people’s lived experience separating each of these sections. These ‘encounters,’ as they are called, are also a key part of the course which accompanies the book.

The five parts have the following titles:

1.  Reflecting: what have we received?

2.  Paying attention: what is going on?

3.  Making connections: where are we in God’s story? 

4.  Seeking answers: how do we hear God? 

5.  Conversing: what can we learn from each other?

There is much to commend the material and much which rightly causes Christians to think. The fact that those who are in favour of revision have, in some cases, reacted negatively, shows how this is not simply a veiled way in which to change the Church of England’s position. However, there is at its heart is what seems to me to be a fundamental misunderstanding, generated by the fact that it is primarily observational and anecdotal rather than analytical.

Whilst the document helpfully speaks of John’s Stott’s encouragement to engage in ‘double-reading,’ understanding both the truth of the bible and the culture of the world around, in many ways it fails to do either. In seeking to explain why, it may well be worth looking at how Living in Love and Faith relates both to the Bible and culture.

The Bible

It would be wrong to assume that the material does not intend to take the Bible seriously. Right at the outset there is the stated intention to use a model of Theological Reflection based on Richard Hooker’s pattern of Scripture, tradition and reason. There is a desire to be “led deeper into the truth about the God we encounter in Scripture.” But there is also an underlying assumption that we are awaiting information to which we do not yet have access:

“Discernment of the mind of Christ necessitates careful, prolonged and deep reflection.”

However, rather than a thorough analysis of the texts in question in order to go deeper into the truth about the God we encounter in Scripture, or looking at the hermeneutical principles we might apply to texts, there is a description of the way in which people have understood the Bible, (which is therefore observational rather than analytical). This is perhaps reflected in the title of the fourth part of the book (Seeking answers: how do we hear God?). The result is that throughout the material, although the Bible is used extensively, the whole subject is deemed to be complex and our knowledge of the Bible, provisional.”

Previous

Next