Hypocrisy of Authoritarian Bishops

The Hypocrisy of Authoritarian Bishops  Part 2 By the Revd Dr Lee Gatiss Sophistry I wonder if the bishops who wrote this report did so with a straight face? They tell us that church blessings are not pronouncements, and approval cannot be inferred from them. They...

South Sudan Primate Welcomes Church Leaders but Remains Firm on Biblical Marriage

South Sudan Primate Welcomes Church Leaders but Remains Firm on Biblical Marriage The Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Moderator of the Church of Scotland, the Revd Dr Iain Greenshields, visited South Sudan in the first weekend of February to participate in...

Welby Chooses Disestablishment Over Global Breakup

Welby Chooses Disestablishment over Global Breakup Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has indicated that he prizes the unity of the global Anglican Communion over the continued established status of the Church of England, in surprising comments that were reported...

Conservative Bishops Reaffirm Church’s Teaching on Marriage

Conservative Bishops Reaffirm Church's Teaching on Marriage Fourteen Bishops of the Church of England have published "a relatively short theological summary of the doctrine of marriage as the Church of England has received it, and how it relates particularly to...

Pilgrim’s Process: Trials & Challenges

Pilgrim’s Process By the Revd Dr Peter Sanlon Trials and Challenges As we travel to our heavenly city we face trials and challenges that can feel like they are more than we will be able to bear. The sufferings of this present age are considerable. When we are alone...

New Bishop to the Archbishops Announced

New Bishop to the Archbishops Announced The Rt Revd David Urquhart has been announced as the new Bishop to the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, succeeding Dr Emma Ineson who has been appointed Bishop of Kensington. In this role, he will work directly for both...

Proper Bishops, PLEASE by the Northern Churchman

Proper Bishops, Please by the Northern Churchman In their proposals on human sexuality, the College of Bishops have given the Church of England a managerial solution to theological and moral issues. They have sought a compromise detached from Scripture and doctrine,...

Archbishop Has Audience with Sandi

Archbishop has Audience with SandiWhat the Actress Said to the Bishop The Archbishop of Canterbury has had his promised 'coffee and chat' with TV personality and prominent lesbian campaigner Sandi Toksvig. This invitation by Lambeth Palace was issued in response to an...

Letter: Solemn Times

Letter Solemn Times   Dear Sir, It is always easier to provide negative feedback and to criticise, than to be positive. I therefore just wanted to say that I totally agree with the Editorial in your current issue (EC8122).  We are living in tremendously solemn...

Letter: Law & Politics

Letter Law & Politics Dear Sir, The historian Robert Conquest posited a law about politics, that the simplest way to explain the behaviour of any bureaucratic organisation is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies. Can this 'law' explain the...

We Wish You a Merry Saturnalia: Northern Churchman

We Wish You a Merry Saturnalia?

The Northern Churchman

There is a familiar feel to this time of year. The Christmas advertising on television, the darker evenings, the Carol Services – and the inevitable scoffers who call the Christmas story a myth. Not ‘Once in Royal David’s City’ but, according to them, ‘Once upon a time in Royal David’s City’.

One old favourite of these detractors is to take issue with the Christmas festival itself: “You Christians just took over the bawdy Saturnalia feasting from the Romans.” Or “It is just a reworking of the midwinter festival of Sol Invictus – the pagan celebration of the sun god Sol who ‘dies’ as the sun reaches its lowest point in the sky, and who rises again as the days begin to get longer.”

Their conclusion? Christmas (and presumably the Christian faith itself) is just a retelling of pagan myths with little history behind it. Those who make such accusations seem to think they have come up with an unanswerable objection to Christianity.

How is a Christian to answer this? How did we come to celebrate the birth of Jesus in late December?

The information in Luke’s Gospel, with shepherds in fields at night, would indicate a warmer month than December for the date of the Nativity. For the first couple of centuries of the Church’s life, Christians weren’t especially interested in dates of birth, but dates of death.

For the early Church the Lord’s Day was the Day of Resurrection, and the festival of Easter moved in sync with the Passover. Early Christians tended to commemorate the day of the death of a martyr or church figure, as that was the day of their true birth into the heavenly kingdom. Thus the birth of Jesus, or indeed anyone else, didn’t feature highly as a celebration.

Christians of the time considered that the calendar should be a tidy affair, drawing from the orderly account of creation in Genesis 1. They held that a righteous person died on their birthday. In the case of Jesus, this day of birth and day of death was calculated initially as 25th March. 

However, by the end of the third century, there were those in the Church who refused to believe in the divinity of Jesus. They taught that God adopted Jesus as his Son at his baptism, and so he could not be the eternal Son of the Father. To safeguard the divine nature of Jesus even in the womb of Mary, the Council of Nicaea decreed that 25th March should be reckoned at the date of the miraculous conception. Hence the date to celebrate his birthday moved by nine months to 25th December.

What can we say in answer to the detractors? First of all, we can challenge them on the facts:

  • Is there really an exact correspondence between the Saturnalia and Christmas? The Roman festival concluded on 23rd December, and that’s not even Christmas Eve! 
  • It’s a very neat theory that the Christians took over Sol Invictus festival on 25th December – except Sol Invictus is first recorded as a celebration in AD 386, and the date of Christmas was determined by the Council of Nicaea in 325.

It seems the facts do not back up the claims of the scoffers; their theories are lazy comparisons. 

Thoughtful Christians know that we are not saying that 25th December is Jesus’ actual birthday, but that we may as well celebrate his birth at a commonly-agreed time of the year. The date chosen was designed to express a key truth about Jesus’ identity as the God of God and Light of Light, the Word made flesh dwelling among us. Even the calendar was calculated and tweaked to express theological truth. If we know how to answer the scoffer and sceptic on the reason for 25th December, we might then ask them that key question: Who is Jesus?

As a footnote, we might recall that one of the bishops attending the Council of Nicaea that set the date of Christmas was a certain Nicholas of Myra. Ho ho ho!